Friends

Fire at Emerald City

Paxus - Thu, 21/03/2024 - 12:58

Shortly after the equinox ritual called the element of air, wind blew hard enough to send plastic chairs flying around us. When we called water, clouds blocked the sun and it felt for a moment like we might actually get rain. And less than 15 minutes after we called the element of fire into the circle, brown clouds from the neighbors land started billowing overheard in the courtyard.

This is what the fire looked like from the Twin Oaks grave yard

I broke from the ritual to check in with the office person. Kathryn had already dispatched Sabrina to the graveyard to see what she could see. When i got there half an hour later i took the above picture and was relieved to see the first so far form our property line. My relief was misinformed.

The picture above is about where the fire started but did not give any real indication of how far the fire had spread at that moment. Within half an hour of this first sighting the local Louisa Fire Department was here in force. They blocked traffic on W. Old Mountain Road. They told us to go across Vigor Road (which the Twin Oaks driveways are on) and wait for the all clear. And so almost everyone stopped doing what they we and went across the street. The preparation of dinner was interrupted, so Keenan and Kelpie went and got a bunch of pizzas for everyone. Things seemed to be improving and the fire department let us come back and eat our pizzas in the courtyard.

But things were not getting better. Before 7 PM, we were being told we needed to evacuate the entire Twin Oaks campus. A school bus was brought in and took people to Acorn and the Louisa middle school, where they waited out the fire fighting.

Emerald City is gone

The fire spread from the neighboring land and took out the kilns, the warehouse and all the woodworking spaces (called ECW). It also spread to the conference site and destroyed the pavilion, the kitchen and all of the material storage up there. Miraculously, Oz (which is the spray varnish building that had burned some years back and had been replaced by a steel and concreate building) survived the blaze.

After some hours, after surveying briefly the damage i spotted a number of small fires in the woods between Tupelo and EC. I spent a couple of hours extinguishing these, while the fire fighters were working on bigger blazes. Perhaps most scary was their work on a fire which was quite near Tupelo, one of our larger residences.

After the fire fighters had largely controlled the fire, there were still many fires in the trees.

The problem was several trees were still on fire higher up than could be reached and were dropping burning branches to the ground. But fortunately the cool night air was reducing the spread of the fire.

In all this tragedy there is some good news. No one was hurt, none of the various pets, many of which could not be found at the time of the evacuation, have been reported missing. No residences were harmed (though Tupelo had a close call).

At about midnight a young fire fighter came across me doing my small fire extinguishing thing and encouraged me to go home, saying these small fires in this cold night air were unlikely to spread and that the fire fighters would be monitoring the woods for any spread and would be there until the whole situation was under control.

Exhausted and covered with ash i returned to the courtyard where some of our members returned, while many stayed overnight at other locations in town.

You can contribute to the general Twin Oaks Community Fire Relief Fund, the Twin Oaks Conference Site Fire Relief Fund, or both.

You can contribute to the general Twin Oaks Community Fire Relief Fund via Stripe. This link has the lowest fees, and contributions will focus primarily on general repairs and restoration. You can contribute using a debit card, credit card, Apple Pay, Cash App, Klarna or a bank account. ​​Contributions via this link are not tax deductible. Donate to the Twin Oaks Recovery Fund here, or by scanning the QR code.

You can donate to the Twin Oaks Conference Site Fire Relief Fund via DonorBox. These donations will focus primarily on restoring the conference site. Donations via this link are tax-deductible via the Foundation for Intentional Community’s fiscal sponsorship of the TOCC. Donate to the Twin Oaks Conference site Fire Relief Fund here.

Thank you friends. I will likely update in a future blog post and updates will be added to the FB group as well, https://www.facebook.com/groups/TwinOaksFriends.

Categories: Friends

A reflection on the evolution of Twin Oaks

Paxus - Wed, 03/01/2024 - 13:26

By Keenan

Dining: 

Twin Oaks BETA version) Llano is crowded, noisy, and filthy and should be condemned.

Twin Oaks 2.0) ZK sets new standard in luxuriousness and cleanliness at Twin Oaks.

Twin Oaks 3.0) ZK is crowded, noisy, and filthy and should be condemned. Dining should happen in Llano, but only if it has a less offensive name.

Visitor program:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Visitors housed in SLG’s.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Visitors housed in Aurora.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Visitors housed in SLG’s and Ta Chenerates housed in Aurora.

Degania:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Degania is built for childrens’ program.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Degania abandoned.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Degania used for childrens’ program and then Degania abandoned again.

Technology:

Twin Oaks BETA version) No video allowed anywhere.

Twin Oaks 2.0) No video allowed in bedrooms.

Twin Oaks 3.0) No video allowed in public spaces.

Allowance:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Allowance is .75 cents a month

Twin Oaks 2.0) Allowance is $35.00 a month

Twin Oaks 3.0) Allowance is $115.00 a month

Behavior issues:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Behaviorism will deal with any problematic behaviors among members.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Behaviorism doesn’t work. Problematic behavior is dealt with through policy: feedbacks, support groups, process team, mediation, mental health team, and membership team.

Twin Oaks 3.0) nothing works to change problematic behavior—reject all visitors who exhibit any potentially problematic behavior.

A/C:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Air conditioning kills the planet.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Air conditioning protects equipment, but is not for people.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Air conditioning kills mold and saves lives.

What is offensive: 

Twin Oaks BETA version) Makeup and shaving are offensive.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Having babies is offensive.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Wrong pronouns are offensive.

Buildings:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Naming buildings after past communal efforts is uplifting and inspirational.

Twin Oaks 2.0) No new buildings to name.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Naming buildings after past communities with problematic values is offensive.

Children:

Twin Oaks BETA version) No children until the community is ready.

Twin Oaks 2.0) The community raises children. Biological parents discouraged from caring for children. Censor children’s books to remove all mention of “mother” or “father.”

Twin Oaks 3.0) Pregnancy approval process to ensure that parents really want to be parents. Parents raise children.

Labor:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Variable labor system (members work too much).

Twin Oaks 2.0) Quota is set at 49 (members work too much).

Twin Oaks 3.0) Quota is set at 42 (members work too much).

Taking a break:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Don’t leave the farm during a hammocks push.

Twin Oaks 2.0) P.A.L. policy

Twin Oaks 3.0) P.A.L., Suspended membership, Emotional LOA, Sabbatical, and Associate Membership.

Building design:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Members reject mainstream building practices, like proper foundations. All building labor comes from Twin Oaks members

Twin Oaks 2.0) Members accept mainstream building practices and most building labor comes from Twin Oaks members.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Building labor is hired.

Income:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Hammocks is main income source. Concerns about Pier 1 as main account eventually prove accurate.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Tofu is main income source. Concerns about cost of upgrading tofu eventually prove accurate.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Seed Racks is main income source. Concerns…?

Decision-making:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Members involved in all decisions of the community.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Decision-making happens at the managerial level after much community process.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Members are sometimes, but not always, informed of decisions.

Ex-members:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Ex-members are treated like traitors to the values of Twin Oaks.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Ex-members are treated like old friends and welcome to come to parties.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Ex-members buy adjoining property.

Cleanliness:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Cleaning is a bourgeois middle-class affectation that focuses on appearance over substance.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Cleaning with chemicals is bad for the planet.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Mold kills! Scrub everything! Use bleach!

Trees:

Twin Oaks BETA version) There are no trees near newly built buildings.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Plant trees to provide coolness and shade buildings.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Fight mold! Cut trees near buildings down! 

You are a long term member after…:

Twin Oaks BETA version) 2 years

Twin Oaks 2.0) 5 years

Twin Oaks 3.0) 10 years

Longest term member at Twin Oaks:

Twin Oaks BETA version) McCune

Twin Oaks 2.0) McCune

Twin Oaks 3.0) McCune

Communal networking:

Twin Oaks BETA version) Twin Oaks is isolated and focused on survival.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Twin Oaks helps build a national communal movement (Communities magazine, builds FEC, Leaves of Twin Oaks, welcomes national media).

Twin Oaks 3.0) Twin Oaks helps develop a local network of communities in Louisa County.

Leaving Twin Oaks:

Twin Oaks BETA version) You get nothing if you leave Twin Oaks.

Twin Oaks 2.0) You get $50 and a hammock.

Twin Oaks 3.0) You get nothing if you leave Twin Oaks.

Death:

Twin Oaks BETA version) No need for a cemetery.

Twin Oaks 2.0) Cemetery in the woods on a hill.

Twin Oaks 3.0) Can’t keep track of buried bodies.

This is mainly satire, please don’t message the blamer…also…make your own additions to the evolution of Twin Oaks.

Categories: Friends

Saving Democracy, again

Paxus - Wed, 06/12/2023 - 20:33

Back in 2018, a group of communitarians went to Florida to work on an amendment to the state constitution which would restore voting rights to ex-felons. In a close race we won this election which would have turned the state blue with over 1.4 million state residents being able to vote. Sadly, Ron DeSantis was also elected in that cycle and with his keen disregard for the will of the people of the state, he gutted the referendum, blocked felons from getting their vote and set up an election police which was specifically designed to intimidate BIPOC voters and maintain the Republican majority of that state.

Flip Team in Florida 2018

Despite DeSantis meddling, this idea of out-of-state volunteers helping in state wide elections with national significance was compelling to a number of communitarians. In 2020, we went to Maine to try to unseat Republican Senator Susan Collins and then went to Georgia for the two run off elections which we helped win and secure the Senate for the Democrats. In 2022, we came back to Georgia for another runoff election and were successful again.

Our specialty is choosing close elections, recruiting creative and enthusiastic communitarians and helping tilt the balance away from authoritarianism and voter suppression. In the 2024 cycle we also have reproductive rights on the ballot in many states and if there was ever a time to fight the country’s drift towards tyranny it is now.

I would encourage you to read the brand new Flip 2024 Prospectus and support this project. There are 3 ways you can help:

Air Team: The Air team provides support for our efforts on the ground, providing key analytical
and logistical support to the ground team(s) in the target states. We recruit air team members
through our blog posts, social media posts, Democratic party newsletters, and more. Air team members are typically volunteers working from home.


Ground Team: This team includes the volunteers who are physically in-state. The ground team is flexible in its approach and always looking for opportunities to attract voter attention. We lean in to the skills of a given team on the ground in a given area. For example, when our team consists of analysts and
policy wonks we tend to do more GOTV efforts like developing and distributing free ride share
to the polls info. When the ground team consists dominantly of musicians and street
performers, we are likely to be out staging a performance, create a video, a flash mob or some other type of event. We pay our canvassers and we also organize paid canvassing work sponsored by
affiliated groups to help compensate them (e.g. SEIU, PTP, Planned Parenthood, etc).

Angel Team: The Angel team focuses on finding & providing resources for the other teams this includes everything from finding free housing to cash contributions to grocery store gift cards. We have historically funded our work via crowdfunding and community support. We have had a good mix of larger angel funders and small donations. This style of funding maximizes our freedom and flexibility.

If you would like to make a donation please visit our GoFundMe crowd funder.

Categories: Friends

Unnoticed

The Way Is The Goal - Thu, 01/12/2022 - 12:19

Notice how life passes. And see how we get absorbed by life’s drama. The drama that for some represents everything. And for others, nothing. As if, it’s unreal. Drama is an experience. It is cultural by nature. It is what we live by. Drama can also, simultaneously, be beautiful as well as ugly. It is […]

The post Unnoticed appeared first on Robino.Co.

Categories: Friends

Interesting graph on growth inequality, for US

Dante - Fri, 21/09/2012 - 22:13

Interesting graph on growth inequality, for US :

http://stateofworkingamerica.org/who-gains/#/?start=1985&end=2008

( with sliding scales )

Between 1985 and 2008,
the richest 10 percent got 95 percent of the growth ;
the bottom 90 percent shared 5 percent of that growth

also see :

Categories: Friends

97% Owned – Monetary Reform documentary

Dante - Sat, 28/07/2012 - 13:41

97% owned present serious research and verifiable evidence on our economic and financial system. This is the first documentary to tackle this issue from a UK-perspective and explains the inner workings of Central Banks and the Money creation process.

When money drives almost all activity on the planet, it’s essential that we understand it. Yet simple questions often get overlooked, questions like; where does money come from? Who creates it? Who decides how it gets used? And what does this mean for the millions of ordinary people who suffer when the monetary, and financial system, breaks down?

Produced by Queuepolitely and featuring Ben Dyson of Positive Money, Josh Ryan-Collins of The New Economics Foundation, Ann Pettifor, the “HBOS Whistleblower” Paul Moore, Simon Dixon of Bank to the Future and Nick Dearden from the Jubliee Debt Campaign.

Political philosopher John Gray, commented, “We’re not moving to a world in which crises will never happen or will happen less and less. We are in a world in which they happen several times during a given human lifetime and I think that will continue to be the case”
If you have decided that crisis as a result of the monetary system is not an event you want to keep revisiting in your life-time then this documentary will equip you with the knowledge you need, what you do with it is up to you.

Categories: Friends

Pots, Pans and Other Solutions

Dante - Thu, 26/07/2012 - 15:17

I feel that the context and process described by some of the people interviewed in this documentary seems to correspond somewhat to an intentional approach I d like to support with a shared narrative process aided by a linked-data interface :

“Political Parties give the opportunity to people not to think by themselves”

“Political Parties and politicians maintain their own interests”

http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/iceland-after-the-meltdown-what-we-can-learn-from-their-realdemocracy-movement/2012/07/24

“In Iceland, the first European country to wake up to an economic crash, people became aware that they could and should intervene in society and started demanding more democratic participation. The payment of bank debts by citizens went to referendum. The government was forced to create a Council to write a new constitution: a citizens’ group – without politicians, lawyers or university professors – who opened the discussion process to everybody and managed to approve by consensus a draft proposal.”

Categories: Friends

Leipzig Legal Framework

Dante - Fri, 22/06/2012 - 20:15

From: Dante-Gabryell Monson
Date: Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:10 PM
Subject: Re:
To: tim.r

Hi Tim,

I feel enthusiastic when reading your message.

I am certainly interested in the potential to build on your experience,
including what concerns legal frameworks.

I wish to inform some friends, including in cc Leander ( who is currently in Leipzig, and co-organizes the Fairventure event ) ,
and in bcc Anthony.

Leipzig sounds like a good opportunity to meet up and discuss such frameworks more in detail.

Regarding the legal framework, as a first step for me is the housing aspect,
I was considering the “Mietshauser syndikat” approach ( http://www.syndikat.org/ ) ,
which indeed combines all three : Verein, Genossenschaft , and Gmbh.
( yet there are more models I will consider , possibly trying out several models for different buildings : http://www.stiftung-trias.de/infomaterial.html )

Regarding the development of post-industrial manufacturing, this is a chapter in which people involved in the german chapter of open source ecology are more engaged in

http://osede.org/

http://oseeurope.org/2012/01/creating-ose-community-in-germany/

http://opensourceecology.org/wiki

I try to see if there is way in joining potentials regarding a wider span of infrastructure investment.

Rewig sounds like an interesting model to do so.

For the moment, I have been mostly into researching opportunities in Leipzig,
and now try to focus on buying a first building.

I do not have money of my own, so I depend on investors.
I prefer a model with no centralized ownership.

For the moment, I have a list of friends interested in putting forward a few thousand euros to buy their flat. If a partnership can be made with Mietshauser syndikat, by setting up our own legal framework first, 3/4 of the money can come via credit guaranteed by Mietshausersyndikat, which reduces the requirement for cash, per flat, to 2500 euros.

I also found an investor willing to make available 100 000 euros to buy an entire building in Leipzig, at the condition that he remains the sole investor,
while enabling us to live there without payment of rent for a few years.
I imagine this as a first step to converge friends to live and Leipzig and further the broader project.

I am thinking about a building which is already in a good livable condition, such as this one

http://www.immobilienscout24.de/expose/64017966?navigationbarurl=/Suche/S-14/Haus-Kauf/Sachsen/Leipzig/-/-/300,00-

Speak to you soon / see you soon,
Dante

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Tim R wrote:
Dear Dante,

great to hear from you, I hope things are going well for you!

Also great to hear about the ecological ideas which you and your friends are trying to advance.

One of the many facets of the concept of regional economic communities is to provide a legal and communal framework for just such ideas!

My experience is that while it is “fairly easy” to have such ideas, it’s not so easy to implement them – so much to do with law and finances, contracts and obligations. The ReWiG München for example is a cooperative based on the above linked concept – and we’re currently about one year behind where we originally wanted to be, despite now having about 100 members, about 20 of which are more or less really active. But the good news is, we’re glad to support other initiatives with the know-how and official papers which we have accumulated on the way, so that others can have things go easier and quicker.

Please note that the concept is intended to be very flexible and all neccessary modifications for a local situation are welcome. If the local solution is still (within a large tolerance) close enough to the concept to be called a ReWiG, then the ReWiG München, which has patented the word ReWiG, will gladly concent to people using it. This in turn will qualify the initiative to participate in the “Rat der ReWiGs” Verband, where continuing exchange of experience and mutual support will be available.

As an example of flexibilty I mention the second ReWiG: ReWiG Schlehdorf eG. They are not yet planning to invest in local businesses nor to start a local currency – rather they are taking over an existing ecological farm which also offers nature experience for young people. But they have their hearts in the right place and they have founded a cooperative, and we’re glad to support them and grant the right to the name ReWiG. In a similar way I could well imagine a ReWiG in Leipzig initially dedicated to getting the projects you’re looking at instantiated, and at the same time being part of a movement could help (a) getting started, and (b) to expand horizons and take up further possible aspects of a ReWiG in due time (e.g. an own local currency and marketplace, or cooperation with local authorities).

Verein: I’d be a little bit careful if Verein is really the right vehicle. In Germany a Verein is traditionally a group a people furthering a pastime, sport or charity of some sort, or preserving local tradition and such things. Many of them are tax-exempt due to meeting the neccessary criteria for exemption. Normally a Verein is not associated with doing business. There IS however a type of legal body similar in quite a few ways to a Verein but intended for doing business, and that’s the Cooperative (Genossenschaft). There are constructs whereby a Verein is used as a tax-exempt body to aid donations, and uses a Plc (GmbH) or such as its business-arm (which can then make a profit), or others involving a foundation (for endowments), but personally I find these somewhat cumbersome – as though people are effectively trying to get around legal restrictions.

Leipzig: We’ll be at the fairventure Congress in Leipzig on 7. – 8. June this year, so that would be an opportunity to meet and discuss face to face.

Am 01.04.2012 14:01, schrieb Dante-Gabryell Monson:
parallel note ( sorry, in english – feel free to reply in german ) :

I wish to express my personal interest in the VAWT development process.
( but also in potentially parallel research, such as http://sharewiki.org/en/Tensegrity , including for VAWT structures )

Personally, I look forward to contribute, once I manage to set myself up in Berlin or Leipzig. ( am currently in Brussels )

A few , potentially converging points :

Regarding The construction place, and the legal platform , I may see some convergences I hope to be able to exploit together :

1)

I am attempting to further the Leipzig Housing Cooperative project , and potentially also abandoned factory space for post-industrial manufacturing ?

http://sharewiki.org/en/Leipzig_project

2)

I wish to set up a legal platform ( a “Verein” ) in Germany.

Who is willing to set up a Verein together in Germany ?

Did anyone set one up yet ?

Another option I consider, is the set up of a International Verein, in Belgium :

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/AISBL

internationale VoG (Vereinigung ohne Gewinnerzielungsabsicht)

as to facilitate the convergence of money invested in such kind of projects.
( starting with the purchase of a first building in Leipzig )

///

I also wish to investigate the interest or feasibility of setting up a not for profit investment scheme, with as outcome local infrastructure for resilient local economics.

One inspiration , midst others, may be to adapt/tweak/collaborate with the following model
http://regionale-wirtschaftsgemeinschaft.info/infothek/initiativen/ ? ( I bcc Tim )

Cordially,
Dante

Categories: Friends

critical networks

Dante - Fri, 22/06/2012 - 20:00

From: Dante-Gabryell Monson
Date: Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:09 PM
Subject: Leipzig ? Social Design – “critical networks” : requirements and development practices ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_design#Strategic_thinking

As Amartya Sen writes, poverty is seen as deprivation of capabilities. By focussing on capabilities, rather than e.g. income, Amartya Sen suggests that development within various social aspects of life can contribute to general development.

extrait – de Dante :

” In addition to development practices,
I wish to outline all of these requirement into modules,
that help define the costs on a context based approach for
“business plans”, packaged and sold as “use value insurance” … ”

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dante-Gabryell Monson
Date: Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:33 PM
Subject: “critical networks” : requirements and development practices ?
To:

Hi Michel, Hi p2pf’ers

did you come across materials laying out a synthesis of very specific characteristics and requirements
around what I am tempted to call “critical networks” ?

Perhaps there is some other name for this ?

I think of “critical network” as distinctive from, yet potentially including , the concept of “critical mass”.

In the way I envision it,
“Critical Network” where the required “critical” properties for an operational or emergent networked system may not merely be a mass of users,
but specific properties ( such as measurable forms of reciprocity, physical location, resources, knowledge and skills, or other variables ) related to the constituents and context for specific intentional “process economies” to be enabled.

Including the mode of access to resources required for specific kinds of emergence.

I want to understand ( and have access to examples of ) various characteristics required to facilitate and multiply “local process economies” for viable and convivial living systems

http://p2pfoundation.net/Process_Economy

as to document step by step strategy proposals,

not merely in a “enclosed” / monetized approach,

but rather within a larger wealth acknowledgment system

http://p2pfoundation.net/Wealth_Acknowledgment_Systems

towards communal sharing in intentional economic networks.

I put an emphasis on understanding “starting points” for ( at first small scale )
“critical networks”.

I can find inspiration in homebrew revolutions ( and examples such as e-farm , open manufacturing, … ),
but also recommendations related to the set up of “transition towns”
( http://www.transitionnetwork.org/resources/transition-primer )

I can also find inspiration in ( reading excerpts online )
of books such as

http://www.integralcity.com/

and the p2p urbanism and p2pf blog , wiki and lists.

/////

What I wish, is to define requirements more accurately,
offering post-industrial alternatives to sometimes publicly supported “gentrification urban development models” ( which I observe here in Brussels too ),
that seem to be aligned or inspired by Richard Florida’s Creative Class approach of development

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_class

I am also particularly interested in converging such understanding into building up “games” ,
and use such games as a form of synthesis practice to empower “critical networks”
for a intentional information and communication framework,
with incentives and related metrics, empowering collective intelligence and collaborative action.

I am aware such question may open up a large conceptual map, including the ones already layed out by you and p2pf peers.

I am interested in condensing it, into specifics, specific step by step examples.
e-farm may offer an example.

I want to know where and how to focus/aggregate attention as first steps,
and bring it into “real social” ( http://p2pfoundation.net/Real_Social )
“real games”.

For the moment, I consider “Housing Cooperatives” and “Group Purchasing Organizations” as starting points in post-industrial frameworks, as some first aggregator layers, on which to build other relational dynamics around food and housing.

Food production, food logistics, but also food as aggregator, such as http://sharewiki.org/en/Semantic_Kitchen ,
and then alternative currencies and wealth acknowledgment systems supporting more and more complex transaction potentials.

I also like the approach of learning spaces as aggregators for bringing together “Critical Network” requirements and development practices, such as the “University” project promoted by Dougald :

http://dougald.posterous.com/day-27-help-me-start-a-university

Perhaps some of you read ( I did not ) the “integral city” book.

Is there a comprehensive list of requirements set out ?

Also , what are the capital requirements for such kind of “ventures”,
as to converge or purchase infrastructure requirements to enable the functioning of a critical network for a p2p resilient and convivial civilization of collaborative individualists?

In addition to development practices,
I wish to outline all of these requirement into modules,
that help define the costs on a context based approach for
“business plans”, packaged and sold as “use value insurance” …

Categories: Friends

Thu, 01/01/1970 - 01:00